The government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has received millions of dollars aimed at stopping deforestation and promoting sustainable development from donor countries and organizations despite breaching a moratorium on new logging concessions, claims the environmental NGO Greenpeace.
Congolese leaders suspended the issuance of logging rights in 2002 to get a handle on the protection of the country’s forests after a brutal civil war. However, Greenpeace reported on Febuary 1, 2017 DRC’s former Minister of the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Sustainable Development Robert Bopolo Mbongeza, greenlighted two concessions, totaling 4,000 square kilometers (1,544 square miles), to the Groupe Les Bâtisseurs du Congo (GBC) and to a group known only as “APC.”
That’s about four times the size of Berlin, or one and a half times the size of the U.S. state of Rhode Island.
“[T]he contract to GBC and approval letter to APC is illegal and a violation of the 2002 moratorium on the allocation of industrial logging titles,” said Greenpeace forest campaigner Irène Wabiwa Betoko in a statement from the organization.
Rumblings from within the DRC government, including comments from Bopolo, indicated that leaders may try to end the moratorium soon. Still, its efficacy has been in doubt since it was first instituted. Research by the International Workgroup for Indigenous Affairs based in Copenhagen, Denmark, has shown that the awarding of concessions has continued since 2002.
Greenpeace questions why DRC is on the cusp of receiving funds tied to the protection of its forests from the Norwegian government and the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI), when the government has given out permits after those agreements were signed.
CAFI signed an agreement in April 2016 with DRC worth $200 million to help the country protect its forests, the largest agreement in Africa for REDD+, short for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. REDD+ aims to help forest countries reduce their carbon emissions and develop sustainably. DRC holds about 60 percent of the Congo Basin’s forests.
In October, CAFI approved the first payment of $40 million. The agreement stipulates that disbursement of the second tranche of funds is contingent upon the country meeting certain “policy and programmatic milestones.”
Greenpeace claims that Vidar Helgesen, head of Norway’s Climate and the Environment Ministry, visited DRC in August 2016 “to prepare the first disbursement” from a forest-protection fund led by Norway worth $200 million.
In July, Greenpeace asked for investigations into how these concessions have been awarded – and to whom.
The press statement indicates that the president of the GBC board of directors, Faustin Lokinda Litalema, is also the agriculture and rural development director to DRC President Joseph Kabila. GBC received a 25-year lease on 162,936 hectares (629 square miles) in Tshopo province in northeastern DRC.
A “legal representative” of APC, Jacques Mokako Nzeke, is also a member of parliament. In September, Bopolo started the process to award APC with a 239,393-hectare (924-square-mile) tract of land in the northwestern province of Mongala. To close the deal, it was to have been signed within 90 days. Greenpeace said in the statement that it “believes” it’s been signed, but it does not have proof.
The previous environment minister, Bienvenu Liyota Ndjoli, awarded several concessions on his watch, later defending his actions by saying that a 2009 review of titles allowed the reissuance of “defunct permits.”
After his installation as environment minister, Bopolo told the Agence France-Presse that he ordered the cancellation of three “illegal contracts that are null and void” signed by Liyota and awarded to Chinese companies in 2015.
In an August 2016 letter obtained by Greenpeace, then-Prime Minister Augustin Matata Pony Mapon said that the cancelation of those concessions should be sufficient for DRC to receive payment from CAFI.
But in July, a group of NGOs said that just canceling the concessions wouldn’t be enough. In a confidential letter to CAFI’s board, Global Witness, Rainforest Foundation UK, Rainforest Foundation Norway, the Environmental Investigation Agency and Greenpeace argued for an investigation to identify the people responsible for these permits to make sure that corruption in the forestry sector does not continue.
They also called for “a further investigation to determine whether there have been any further breaches of the moratorium, and, if so, to assure that these concessions are cancelled as well.”
Now, Greenpeace representatives are asking that CAFI stop all its activities until these issues are sorted out.
“To ensure that donor money is not wasted, a suspension of the entire CAFI program needs to be urgently put in place until a thorough revision of its overall approach including the adoption of adequate monitoring mechanisms and safeguards is carried out,” said Greenpeace’s Wabiwa.
Click here to read the original article.